Independent auditors’ report
To the Shareholders of Shoreline Mall p.l.c.
55
Responsibilities of the Directors for the financial statements
The Directors are responsible for the preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view
in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the EU and the requirement of the Maltese Companies Act
(Cap. 386), and for such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary to enable the
preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability
to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using
the going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to
cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process.
Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
This report, including the opinions set out herein, has been prepared for the Company’s members as
a body in accordance with Articles 179, 179A and 179B of the Companies Act (Cap. 386).
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole
are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report
that includes our opinions in accordance with Articles 179, 179A and 179B of the Companies Act (Cap.
386). Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted
in accordance with ISAs will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can
arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could
reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these
financial statements.
In terms of Article 179A(4) of the Maltese Companies Act (Cap. 386), the scope of our audit does not
include assurance on the future viability of the Company or on the efficiency or effectiveness with which
the Directors have conducted or will conduct the affairs of the Company. The financial position of the
Company may improve, deteriorate, or otherwise be subject to change as a consequence of decisions
taken, or to be taken, by the management thereof, or may be impacted by events occurring after the
date of this opinion, including, but not limited to, events of force majeure.
As such, our audit report on the Company’s historical financial statements is not intended to facilitate
or enable, nor is it suitable for, reliance by any person, in the creation of any projections or predictions,
with respect to the future financial health and viability of the Company, and cannot therefore be utilised
or relied upon for the purpose of decisions regarding investment in, or otherwise dealing with (including
but not limited to the extension of credit), the Company. Any decision-making in this respect should be
formulated on the basis of a separate analysis, specifically intended to evaluate the prospects of the
Company and to identify any facts or circumstances that may be materially relevant thereto.
As part of an audit in accordance with ISAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain
professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due
to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain
audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of
not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from
error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the
override of internal control.